October 2007
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
The Fashion Blog of Papierdoll Magazine
E-mail
Mobile
RSS
Blogs
Trust us, you want these
newsletters.
I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Get fashion on your cell via our
mobile alerts.
I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Now..Now.. Now

Need it, want it, have... no time to wait.

Get your fashion, get it now, get it gone, Let us show you ›

We Blog and Twitter all the time

Check out all of our blogs and our Twitter Pages

Papierblog ›
Thriftychick Shopping Blog ›
International Fashion Blog ›

Recent Comments


Designer Handbag: Designer Handbag... Who’s that Designer? –

victor de souza: victor de souza spring 2009

Drew: everywhere i look i see

Stylechica: I wonder why they decided

WebSnob: Formerly the Halloween Edition, now the I’m So Behind Edition November 3, 2008 | Christina Loves...: [...] Marc Jacobs (1991) auctioned

Fashion Blogging not for Fashion

I was having a conversation with our publisher yesterday and he said something that really gave me pause. He said that the very nature of blogging is antithetical to fashion itself. The vocal want, need, have crowd doesn’t work for an industry that’s meant to keep the masses at bay. The analogy he used as an example was going to an exclusive club. There’s a big bouncer at the door and he’ll let two people in and keep 30 people out. Now one wonders, is the party that good if only a few people can get in? But the wondering causes the masses to stay on the line. At that point whether the party is good or not, it’s irrelevant, you just need to know; so you stay on the line, waiting and hoping to get in. Once you’re in, you might say, “oh that’s it?” You’ll never say that to those still waiting on the line because now, you’re “in”. The analogy might be somewhat crude and meandering a bit, but it is definitely effective.

Blogging is inviting, it’s for the masses. According to him, fashion is not. Blogging offers a comments section, fashion doesn’t care what you think, even if you’re wealthy. Fashion blogging points out the must have, the want, the need. Fashion wants and needs what it can’t have but tries to get anyway. So while I was waxing philosophical I asked him if he had something to tell me about Papierblog. He said no, we’re going to be around for a looong time. He was just wondering. I exhaled a bit and wondered if, just if he could possibly be right. Was Anna Wintour right in keeping the masses at bay and abhorring the very nature of the word blog? Is this thing of ours built for an industry too pretentious to recognize it’s own vanity?

Eva