
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fashion Blogging not for Fashion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/</link>
	<description>Digital.Fashion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MKO</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>MKO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree that fashion and blogging are &quot;antithetical&quot; - just look at what Rishad Tobaccowala said at the WWD/CEO Summit this week. I can see that certain parts of the decision making and creative process are still insulated within a few elites, but taste makers are no longer limited to those circles only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree that fashion and blogging are &#8220;antithetical&#8221; &#8211; just look at what Rishad Tobaccowala said at the WWD/CEO Summit this week. I can see that certain parts of the decision making and creative process are still insulated within a few elites, but taste makers are no longer limited to those circles only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Its very interesting to see this topic come up again and again and a again. I don&#039;t wonder though that if bloggers had what was perceived as taste by the fashion gods if it would be a moot point. We as bloggers are disliked for being hoi polloi but the medium itself is only as good as the messenger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its very interesting to see this topic come up again and again and a again. I don&#8217;t wonder though that if bloggers had what was perceived as taste by the fashion gods if it would be a moot point. We as bloggers are disliked for being hoi polloi but the medium itself is only as good as the messenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I think</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>I think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the point erin-above made; there&#039;s no wonder that with hundreds of fashion blogs and magazines out there, the majority of the people still can&#039;t dress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the point erin-above made; there&#8217;s no wonder that with hundreds of fashion blogs and magazines out there, the majority of the people still can&#8217;t dress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I think</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>I think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>Blogging in any way is just a form of self-expression, as fashion ultimately is too, and self-expression always seeks an audience; you dress yourself fashionably, knowing what you wear will be seen and wanting it to be seen. No fashionista buys a pair of Marnis or Louboutins just so she can walk around in it at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging in any way is just a form of self-expression, as fashion ultimately is too, and self-expression always seeks an audience; you dress yourself fashionably, knowing what you wear will be seen and wanting it to be seen. No fashionista buys a pair of Marnis or Louboutins just so she can walk around in it at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erin</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>But blogging about fashion or reading  about fashion isn&#039;t the same as having it. You might be in the know, but you still don&#039;t own what you read about. And half the time, even reading about it doesn&#039;t help. I dress models for our publications all the time, but when I get out of bed in the morning to get dressed, I still want to cry and wonder why I don&#039;t have a personal style. I guess basically,   my analogy is that you can give away state secrets on the web if want, as long as no one can read the language. So, whether or not you print or blog about fashion, it&#039;s still all up to the reader to read that info, translate it into style and work it. The follow-through will never carry over to the masses, and thus fashion will always have cache, even if nomads in Algeria can read about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But blogging about fashion or reading  about fashion isn&#8217;t the same as having it. You might be in the know, but you still don&#8217;t own what you read about. And half the time, even reading about it doesn&#8217;t help. I dress models for our publications all the time, but when I get out of bed in the morning to get dressed, I still want to cry and wonder why I don&#8217;t have a personal style. I guess basically,   my analogy is that you can give away state secrets on the web if want, as long as no one can read the language. So, whether or not you print or blog about fashion, it&#8217;s still all up to the reader to read that info, translate it into style and work it. The follow-through will never carry over to the masses, and thus fashion will always have cache, even if nomads in Algeria can read about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Snob: &#8216;Cause I&#8217;m a Snob Offline, Too, by Fashion Writer KRiSTOPHER DUKES</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Snob: &#8216;Cause I&#8217;m a Snob Offline, Too, by Fashion Writer KRiSTOPHER DUKES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>[...] can&#8217;t imagine fashion sans French Vogue editrix Carine Roitfeld. » Papierblog asks whether fashion and blogging are incompatible. » Second City Style says no to knock-offs. » StyleBakery.com finds your fall look for under $60 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t imagine fashion sans French Vogue editrix Carine Roitfeld. » Papierblog asks whether fashion and blogging are incompatible. » Second City Style says no to knock-offs. » StyleBakery.com finds your fall look for under $60 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bag Bliss</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Bag Bliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>[...] Papierblog breaks the fourth wall of fashion blogging and asks whether fashion and blogging are incompatible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Papierblog breaks the fourth wall of fashion blogging and asks whether fashion and blogging are incompatible. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuri</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-997</guid>
		<description>I see fashion as a part of culture, albeit a rather niche part.

Your publisher apparently has a very &quot;top-down&quot; view of cultural production that probably is quite antithetical to blogging, which - you&#039;re right - does invite the masses to participate, and encourages more widespread participation. For e.g., I&#039;ve learned about so many small, local designers I&#039;d have never heard about through print media. I think all that&#039;s great, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see fashion as a part of culture, albeit a rather niche part.</p>
<p>Your publisher apparently has a very &#8220;top-down&#8221; view of cultural production that probably is quite antithetical to blogging, which &#8211; you&#8217;re right &#8211; does invite the masses to participate, and encourages more widespread participation. For e.g., I&#8217;ve learned about so many small, local designers I&#8217;d have never heard about through print media. I think all that&#8217;s great, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Beautifully Damned &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Love you Lovefoxx</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>The Beautifully Damned &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Love you Lovefoxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-996</guid>
		<description>[...] fashion from the Papier Doll blog (new cover pic of Irina shown above) that I should share with you. I would love to hear what you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fashion from the Papier Doll blog (new cover pic of Irina shown above) that I should share with you. I would love to hear what you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Santoro</title>
		<link>http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Santoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papierblog.papierdoll.net/2007/10/30/fashion-blogging-not-for-fashion/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>Things change.  And comments?  Blog publishers, just like designers, can take them or leave them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things change.  And comments?  Blog publishers, just like designers, can take them or leave them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
